Li 2006.

Methods	Country where data collected: China Parallel‐group RCT Unit of randomisation: participant Unit of analysis: participant Duration: NR
Participants	Inclusion criteria: NR Exclusion criteria: NR Participants: 277 hospital patients with superficial, deep or residual burn wounds Mean age (years): 30.3 (range 5‐74) Male participants: NR Burn type: NR Burn degree: superficial 46 vs 16; deep 89 vs 32; residual 68 vs 26 Burn size (%TBSA): 3.4 ± 0.6 (range 0.1‐6.0) Burn location: trunk and limbs
Interventions	Intervention arm 1: carbon fibre dressing changed daily Intervention arm 2: 0.5% iodine gauze changed daily Cointerventions: NR
Outcomes	Primary outcome: wound healing Secondary outcome: adverse events
Notes	Funding NR Article in Chinese, extracted and assessed for risk of bias by one review author, discussed with a second review author
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Comment: a random component in the sequence generation process was not reported in detail
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Comment: it did not state how randomisation sequence was allocated
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes	Low risk	Comment: not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Low risk	Comment: results section and tables show that all participant data were included in analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias)	Unclear risk	Comment: protocol not obtained, based on paper only
Other bias	Unclear risk	The whole process of conducting this RCT was not clear