Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 12;2017(7):CD011821. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011821.pub2

Liao 2006.

Methods Country where data collected: China
Parallel‐group RCT (intra‐individual)
Unit of randomisation: burn
Unit of analysis: burn
Duration: NR (until healing)
Participants Inclusion criteria: second‐degree burns (superficial or deep) within 72 h of injury; TBSA ≤ 60%
Exclusion criteria: general infection, pregnancy, patients with serious heart, kidney or liver disease (AST > 1.5; ALT > 1.5); "mental disease"
Participants: 120 hospital patients
Mean age (years): NR
Male participants: 99/120
Burn type: NR
Burn degree: second‐degree; superficial/deep 80/40
Burn size (%TBSA): NR about 100 cm2
Burn location: NR
Interventions Intervention arm 1: 0.1% silver nitrate changed every other day
Intervention arm 2: 1% SSD changed every other day
Cointerventions: wound cleansing with isotonic saline; treatment duration 14 days for superficial wounds, 28 days for deep wounds
Outcomes Primary outcome: wound healing
Secondary outcome: adverse events
Notes Article in Chinese, extracted and assessed for risk of bias by one review author, discussed with a second review author
Funding NR
This was a "split‐body" or "intra‐individual" design where a person with two wounds had one wound randomised to each treatment. It was not clear whether the analysis took account of this.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: a random component in the sequence generation process was not reported in detail
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: it did not state how randomisation sequence was allocated
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: results section and tables show that all participant data were included in analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: protocol not obtained, based on paper only
Other bias Unclear risk The whole process of conducting this RCT was not clear including whether the analysis took account of the intra‐individual design