Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 25;14(4):e0216034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216034

Table 4. Comparison of bacterial factors at diagnosis between the observation and treatment groups.

Total
n = 65
(%)
Untreated group
n = 50
(%)
Treated group
n = 15
(%)
P value
Isolated species
    M.avium 59 (90.8) 44 (88.0) 15 (100.0) P = 0.060
    M.intracellulare 6 (9.2) 4 (8.0) 2 (13.3) P = 0.531
    M.fortuitum 3 (4.6) 1 (2.0) 2 (13.3) P = 0.187
    M.abscessus 4 (6.2) 4 (8.0) 0 (0.0) P = 0.331
    MAC 3 (4.6) 3 (6.0) 0 (0.0) P = 0.331
Polyclonality analyzed by VNTR
    Polyclonal + mixed infection 15 (23.1) 9 (18.0) 6 (40.0) P = 0.076
    Polyclonal infection 9 (13.8) 4 (8.0) 5 (33.3) P = 0.013*
    Mixed infection 10 (15.3) 6 (12.0) 4 (26.7) P = 0.167
Insertion sequence (n = 55) (n = 40) (n = 15)
    IS 1245 49 (89.1) 36 (90.0) 13 (86.7) P = 0.724
    IS 1311 44 (80.0) 31 (77.5) 13 (86.7) P = 0.449
    IS Mav6 29 (52.7) 19 (47.5) 10 (66.7) P = 0.205
    IS Mav6 in Cfp29 region 13 (23.6) 11 (27.5) 2 (13.3) P = 0.271
Plasmids † (n = 53) (n = 39) (n = 14)
    pMAH 9 (17.0) 6 (15.3) 3 (21.4) P = 0.605
    pLR7 1 (1.9) 1 (2.6) 0 (0.0) P = 0.545
    pVT2 10 (18.9) 6 (15.4) 4 (28.6) P = 0.279
    pMAH + pVT2 5 (9.4) 3 (7.7) 2 (14.3) P = 0.469
    pMAH + pLR7 + pVT2 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

VNTR, variable-number tandem-repeat.

*P < 0.05.

†: Only cases in which we could isolate and evaluate the strains of Mycobacterium avium.