Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 4;2017(8):CD005494. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005494.pub4

Summary of findings 2. Sildenafil compared with active control for pulmonary hypertension in neonates.

Sildenafil compared with active control for pulmonary hypertension in neonates
Patient or population: pulmonary hypertension in neonates
 Setting: neonatal intensive care unit
 Intervention: sildenafil
 Comparison: magnesium sulphate
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No. of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with magnesium sulphate Risk with sildenafil
All‐cause mortality Study population RR 0.55
 (0.05 to 5.75) 65
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 VERY LOWa,b Evidence was downgraded due to very serious imprecision, as results from this single study have not been replicated and risk of bias is evident in study design (missing data)
59 per 1000 32 per 1000
 (3 to 338)
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on assumed risk in the comparison group and relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI)
 
 CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; RR: risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
 Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
 Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
 Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

aImprecise due to small sample size; only one included study

bRisk of bias due to missing data (not analysed as intent to treat)