Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 10;2017(8):CD002798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002798.pub4

Comparison 1. Flumazenil versus placebo.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 All‐cause mortality 11 842 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.48, 1.16]
1.1 Overt hepatic encephalopathy 10 822 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.48, 1.16]
1.2 Minimal hepatic encephalopathy 2 20 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 All‐cause mortality and bias control 12 844 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.48, 1.16]
2.1 Low risk of bias 1 527 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.37, 1.53]
2.2 High risk of bias 11 317 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.43, 1.31]
3 All‐cause mortality and trial design 12   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Cross‐over 6 592 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.35, 1.34]
3.2 Parallel‐arm 6 252 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.81 [0.45, 1.44]
4 All‐cause mortality and duration of follow‐up 11   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 ≤ 1 day 5 176 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.38, 1.87]
4.2 > 1 day 6 666 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.42, 1.21]
5 Hepatic encephalopathy 9 824 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.71, 0.80]
5.1 Overt hepatic encephalopathy 9 814 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.73 [0.67, 0.80]
5.2 Minimal hepatic encephalopathy 1 10 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.41, 1.39]
6 Hepatic encephalopathy and bias control 9 824 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.71, 0.80]
6.1 Low risk of bias 1 527 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.72, 0.84]
6.2 High risk of bias 8 297 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.61, 0.78]
7 Hepatic encephalopathy and trial design 9   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
7.1 Cross‐over 4 584 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.77 [0.72, 0.83]
7.2 Parallel‐arm 5 240 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.59, 0.79]
8 Hepatic encephalopathy and duration of follow‐up 9   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
8.1 ≤ 1 day 4 164 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.60, 0.83]
8.2 > 1 day 5 660 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.62, 0.84]
9 Hepatic encephalopathy and acute liver failure 9   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
9.1 Cirrhosis 7 734 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.71, 0.82]
9.2 Acute liver failure or cirrhosis 2 90 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.47, 0.80]
10 Number Connection Test 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
11 All‐cause mortality and acute liver failure 11 842 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.48, 1.16]
11.1 Participants with cirrhosis 9 752 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.45, 1.14]
11.2 Participants with cirrhosis or acute liver failure 2 90 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.06 [0.31, 3.62]