Taweesangsuksalul 2005

Methods	DESIGN: Randomised controlled cross‐over trial BLINDING PROCEDURES: Double blind SAMPLE CALCULATIONS: NO DURATION: 1 procedure FOLLOW‐UP: None WITHDRAWLS/DROPOUTS: None ITT: Not applicable GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION: Thailand SETTING: Not stated
Participants	N = 10 DIAGNOSIS: Neurogenic bladder disfunction ELIGIBLE: Not stated ENROLLED: 10 COMPLETED: 10 AGE: Adults GENDER: 4 male, 6 female
Interventions	Aloe vera versus aqueous gel as lubricant
Outcomes	Catheterisation time Adverse effect Satisfaction (nurse and participant)
Notes	Article written in Thai, abstract available in English.
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Not stated in abstract
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Not stated in abstract
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes	Low risk	Double blind
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes	Low risk	Double blind
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Low risk	No dropouts reported
Source of Funding	Unclear risk	Not stated