Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;2012(11):CD007407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007407.pub3

Basler 1997.

Methods RCT; 2 arms; assessed at pre‐treatment, post‐treatment, 6 months
Participants End of treatment n = 76
Start of treatment n = 94
Sex: 57 F, 19 M
Mean age = 49.3 (SD 9.7)
Source = pain or rehabilitation clinic
Diagnosis = chronic low back pain
Mean years of pain = 10.8
Interventions "CBT added to medical treatment"
"Medical treatment"
Outcomes Primary pain outcome: NRS 0 to 10 pain
Primary disability outcome: disability in physical function from Dusseldorf Disability Scale
Primary mood outcome: none
Catastrophising outcome: PRSS catastrophising
1. Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (0 to 10)
2. Control over pain Numerical Rating Scale (0 to 10)
3. Days per week pain‐free
4. Days per week pain medication use
5. Use of cognitive strategies (self report)
6. Use of avoidance behaviour (self report)
7. Pleasant activities (self report)
8. Social support (self report)
9. Philosophical beliefs (self report)
10. Catastrophising (bespoke scale)
11. Active coping (bespoke scale)
12. Disability in social relationships from Dusseldorf Disability Scale
13. Disability in social roles from Dusseldorf Disability Scale
14. Disability in physical function from Dusseldorf Disability Scale
15. Disability in mental performance from Dusseldorf Disability Scale
16. Disability in physical performance from Dusseldorf Disability Scale
Notes CBT versus TAU, post‐treatment: analyses 3.1, 3.2
Yates quality scale: total quality = 18/35, design quality = 12/26, treatment quality = 6/9
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk “Through assignment of random numbers, patients were allocated to an experimental treatment or a control group.”
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Attrition reported; 1 difference found between dropouts and completers
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Fully reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not reported