Bliokas 2007.
Methods | RCT; 3 arms; assessed at pretreatment and post‐treatment | |
Participants | End of treatment n = 94 Start of treatment n = 143 Sex: 79 F, 64 M Mean age = 45.2 (SD 9.2) Source = referrals to Pain Management Service after medical treatment completed Diagnosis = chronic non‐cancer pain Mean years of pain = median 4.0 |
|
Interventions | "Graded exposure in vivo and outpatient multidisciplinary chronic pain management group program" "outpatient multidisciplinary chronic pain management group program" "Waiting list control" |
|
Outcomes |
Primary pain outcome: pain VAS Primary disability outcome: Pain Disability Index Primary mood outcome: DASS depression Catastrophising outcome: none 1. Pain VAS 2. Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia: fear of movement/re/injury 3. Pain Self‐Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) 4. Pain Disability Index (PDI) 5. Depression, Anxiety & Stress Scale (DASS): depression and anxiety scores only 6. Activity level: performance over 2 weeks of 10 usually avoided activities 7. 6‐minute walk test |
|
Notes | Chronic pain management programme with graded exposure versus waiting list control December 2009 search Data obtained from author: analyses 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 Yates quality scale: total quality = 23/35, design quality = 15/26, treatment quality = 8/9 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random numbers generation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Attrition fully reported; no differences |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Fully reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Examination by physiotherapist and self report: no blinding reported |