Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;2012(11):CD007407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007407.pub3

Kole‐Snijders 1999.

Methods RCT; 3 arms; assessed at pre‐treatment, post‐treatment, 6 months, 1 year
Participants End of treatment n = 133
Start of treatment n = 148
Sex: 94 F, 54 M
Mean age = 30.8 (SD 9.1)
Source = pain or rehabilitation clinic
Diagnosis = chronic low back pain
Mean years of pain = 9.8
Interventions "operant + cognitive coping skills"
"operant + group discussion"
"waiting list"
Outcomes Primary pain outcome: no data available
Primary disability outcome: no data available
Primary mood outcome: no data available
Catastrophising outcome: none
(all reduced by factor analysis to 3 scores: motoric, coping control, negative affect)       
Pain Behaviour Scale
Checklist for Interpersonal Pain Behaviour
Behavioural approach test (walking distance)
Multi dimensional Locus of Control
Pain Cognition Checklist
Coping Strategies Questionnaire
Nijmegen Hyperventilation Questionnaire
Visual analogue scale: pain
McGill Pain Questionnaire: pain
Notes No data
Yates quality scale: total quality = 28/35, design quality = 20/26, treatment quality = 8/9
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk “independent researcher blindly drew [numbers assigned randomly to patients] and assigned to one of three conditions”
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk independent researcher
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Fully reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Reported as factor scores
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Assessor unaware of treatment condition