Parker 1988.
Methods | RCT; 3 arms; assessed at pre‐treatment, 6 months, 1 year | |
Participants | End of treatment n = 83 Start of treatment n = not given Sex: 3 F, 80 M Mean age = 60.6 (SD 7.7) Source = hospital Diagnosis = rheumatoid arthritis Mean years of pain = 11.4 |
|
Interventions | "cognitive behavioural pain management group" "attention placebo group" "control group" (TAU) |
|
Outcomes |
Primary pain outcome: no data available Primary disability outcome: no data available Primary mood outcome: no data available Catastrophising outcome: none Visual analogue scale pain McGill Pain Questionnaire pain dimensions Coping Strategies Questionnaire Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (AIMS) Beck Depression Inventory Symptom Checklist‐90R psychological symptoms Hassles Scale Ways of Coping Questionnaire Arthritis Helplessness Index Disease status measures including walking speed |
|
Notes | No data Yates quality scale: total quality = 17/35, design quality = 13/26, treatment quality = 4/9 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | “using a table of random numbers, subjects were assigned” |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Attrition not reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Partially reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not reported |