Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;2012(11):CD007407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007407.pub3

Vlaeyen 1996.

Methods RCT; 3 arms; assessed at pre‐treatment, post‐treatment, 6 months, 1 year
Participants End of treatment n = 122
Start of treatment n = 131
Sex: 110 F, 15 M
Mean age = 44.0 (SD 9.4)
Source = pain or rehabilitation clinic
Diagnosis = fibromyalgia
Mean years of pain = 10.2
Interventions "cognitive + group discussion"
"education + group discussion"
"waiting list"
Outcomes Primary pain outcome: pain intensity score
Primary disability outcome: none available
Primary mood outcome: BDI depression
Catastrophising outcome: none
Composite scores from factor analysis:
Pain intensity, pain coping, pain control, relaxation, catastrophising, pain behaviour, activity                               
Measures contributing to factors:
Multidimensional Pain Questionnaire: Pain Response Index
Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ)
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (none available)
Fear Survey Schedule
Arthritis knowledge
Maudsley Obsessive Compulsive Inventory
Pain behaviour scale
Multidimensional Pain Locus of Control Scale (MPCL)
Walking distance, walking time, cycling time
Notes CBT versus active, post‐treatment: analyses 1.1, 1.3
Yates quality scale: total quality = 20/35, design quality = 16/26, treatment quality = 4/9
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk “randomly assigned”
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Attrition reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Fully reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not reported