Vlaeyen 1996.
Methods | RCT; 3 arms; assessed at pre‐treatment, post‐treatment, 6 months, 1 year | |
Participants | End of treatment n = 122 Start of treatment n = 131 Sex: 110 F, 15 M Mean age = 44.0 (SD 9.4) Source = pain or rehabilitation clinic Diagnosis = fibromyalgia Mean years of pain = 10.2 |
|
Interventions | "cognitive + group discussion" "education + group discussion" "waiting list" |
|
Outcomes |
Primary pain outcome: pain intensity score Primary disability outcome: none available Primary mood outcome: BDI depression Catastrophising outcome: none Composite scores from factor analysis: Pain intensity, pain coping, pain control, relaxation, catastrophising, pain behaviour, activity Measures contributing to factors: Multidimensional Pain Questionnaire: Pain Response Index Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (none available) Fear Survey Schedule Arthritis knowledge Maudsley Obsessive Compulsive Inventory Pain behaviour scale Multidimensional Pain Locus of Control Scale (MPCL) Walking distance, walking time, cycling time |
|
Notes | CBT versus active, post‐treatment: analyses 1.1, 1.3 Yates quality scale: total quality = 20/35, design quality = 16/26, treatment quality = 4/9 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | “randomly assigned” |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Attrition reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Fully reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not reported |