Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 14;2017(7):CD010031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010031.pub2

Comparison 2. Terbinafine versus placebo.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Clinical cure 8 1006 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 6.00 [3.96, 9.08]
1.1 Short‐term follow‐up (≤ 52 weeks) 6 800 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 5.60 [3.66, 8.55]
1.2 Long‐term follow‐up (> 52 weeks) 2 206 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 26.01 [3.69, 183.44]
2 Mycological cure 8 1006 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 4.53 [2.47, 8.33]
2.1 Short‐term follow‐up (≤ 52 weeks) 6 800 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 4.60 [2.26, 9.36]
2.2 Long‐term follow‐up (> 52 weeks) 2 206 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 7.79 [0.42, 144.44]
3 Adverse events 4 399 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.13 [0.87, 1.47]
4 Recurrence rate 1 35 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.05 [0.01, 0.38]