Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 14;2017(7):CD010031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010031.pub2

Comparison 6. Combination terbinafine plus azole versus terbinafine monotherapy.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Clinical cure 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 Short‐term follow‐up (≤ 52 weeks) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Long‐term follow‐up (> 52 weeks) 0   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Mycological cure 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 Short‐term follow‐up (≤ 52 weeks) 0   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 Long‐term follow‐up (> 52 weeks) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Adverse events 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected