Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 14;2017(7):CD010031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010031.pub2

Gupta 2001b.

Methods Design: single‐blinded RCT
Participants Number of participants randomised: 59
Sex (M/F): 48/11
Mean age: 68 years
Number included in analysis: 59
Number completing treatment: 56
Inclusion criteria: age > 18 years
Type/location/characteristics of infection: toenail onychomycosis caused by S brevicaulis spp Distal and lateral onychomycosis, moderate‐severe disease of target nail
Duration of infection: not stated
Exclusion criteria: allergy to any of the drugs in the study, medications known to interact with study medications, immunocompromise, pregnancy and lactation
Washout period: 6 months for oral and 2 weeks for topical
Setting: USA and Canada (multicentre)
Comorbidities: not stated
Interventions
  1. Griseofulvin 600 mg twice daily  for 12 months

  2. Ketonconazole 200 mg daily for 4 months

  3. Itraconazole pulse therapy for 3 pulses (each pulse = 200 mg twice daily for 1 weeks with 3 weeks off between pulses)

  4. Terbinafine daily for 12 weeks

  5. Fluconazole 150 mg daily for 12 weeks

Outcomes Duration of follow‐up: 12 months
Outcomes measured: clinical cure, mycological cure
Safety and tolerability assessed by: side effects, LFTs, CBC, RFTs
Source of funding Study is stated to be non‐industry‐sponsored
Conflict of interest No conflict of interest identified
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "[e]ligible patients with onychomycosis due to S. brevicaulis were randomly divided to receive treatment with griseofulvin, ketoconazole, itraconazole, terbinafine and fluconazole". "At baseline, for the 5 treatment groups, there was no significant difference in the mean age of the patients or mean severity of disease".
Comment: no method of random sequence generation stated. Baseline characteristics between groups appear similar from the text, but no tabulated data provided
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "[e]ach consecutive patient who fulfilled the inclusion criteria was considered for the study".
Comment: no method of allocation concealment stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Quote: "[s]ingle‐blinded", "Treatment with the oral agents was given as follows: griseofulvin 600 mg twice daily for 12 months, ketoconazole 200 mg daily for 4 months, itraconazole 3 pulses with each pulse consisting of 200 mg twice daily for 1 week on, 3 weeks off, terbinafine 250 mg daily for 12 weeks, and fluconazole 150 mg/day for 12 weeks."
Comment: study states that it is single‐blinded, but does not state any methods for blinding participants or personnel
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Quote: "[s]ingle‐blinded", "When the patients were seen at the follow‐up, at month 12 from the start of treatment, the efficacy parameters were CC (clinical cure) and MC (mycological cure)".
Comment: study states that it is single‐blinded, but does not state any methods for blinding outcome assessment
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "[i]n this study a total of 59 patients with S. brevicaulis onychomycosis of the toes were evaluated". "Patients were randomised to the following groups: griseofulvin (11 patients), ketoconazole (12 patients), itraconazole (12 patients), terbinafine (12 patients) and fluconazole (12 patients)."
Comment: low risk of attrition bias as outcomes for all randomised participants reported, with no exclusions
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results presented as set out in the Methods. All prespecified outcomes appear to be reported.
Other bias Low risk No clear other bias seen