But 2008.

Methods	RCT of TVT‐O versus TOT (Monarc)
Participants	120 women with SUI (31) and MUI (89) Inclusion criteria: women with SUI, or MUI, with SUI as the predominant symptom Exclusion criteria: MUI with predominant UUI Performed under local anaesthesia Mean age years (SD): 52.6 (6.8)
Interventions	Group A: TVT‐O (n = 60) Group B: TOT (n = 60)
Outcomes	Objective cure rates: negative pad test Subjective cure rates: absence of reported SUI Post operative voiding difficulties Tape erosion Duration of operation Duration and intensity of postoperative pain according to a modified VAS QoL (UDI) significantly improved post operatively in each group with no significant intergroup difference.
Notes	Follow‐up 3 months All women attended for follow‐up
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Low risk	Quote: "Before the beginning of the study, the computer‐generated list of 120 random numbers (from one to 120) was made for two groups (60 random numbers for each group, optimum allocation ratio 1)"
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Quote: "the consecutive study numbers were given after admission, and based on this admission number, either inside‐out or outside‐in procedure was selected later in the OR according to a computer‐ generated list of random number"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	No information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	No information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Low risk	All data/information accounted for at follow‐up