Cervigni 2006.
Methods | RCT of TVT versus Monarc TOT | |
Participants | 118 women Inclusion criteria: women with SUI and POP‐Q ≥ stage 2 Mean age 57.43 years All women had cystocoele repair and levator myorraphy 73 women were post menopausal |
|
Interventions | Group A: TVT Group B: TOT (exact numbers in each group not reported) |
|
Outcomes | Cure rates: TVT (98.3%), TOT (97.1%) as exact number of women in each group was not given there were no data that could be extracted Intraoperative and postoperative complications |
|
Notes | Numbers in each group unreported. It was, thus, impossible to abstract results | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Women randomised into 2 groups (computer generated randomisation list) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |