Chen 2010.
Methods | RCT comparing TVT, TOT and TVT‐O | |
Participants | 187 women Inclusion criteria: women with urodynamically proven SUI in the urology department of a Chinese hospital |
|
Interventions | Group A: TVT (n = 77) Group B: TOT (n = 45) Group C: TVT‐O (n = 65) |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | No quality of life measures undertaken Cystoscopy performed in TVT group |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |