Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 31;2017(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4

Chen 2010.

Methods RCT comparing TVT, TOT and TVT‐O
Participants 187 women
Inclusion criteria: women with urodynamically proven SUI in the urology department of a Chinese hospital
Interventions Group A: TVT (n = 77)
Group B: TOT (n = 45)
Group C: TVT‐O (n = 65)
Outcomes
  • Objective cure: negative stress test

  • Mean operative time in minutes

  • Mean postoperative hospital stay days (SD)

  • Bladder perforation

  • Vascular injury

  • Voiding dysfunction

Notes No quality of life measures undertaken
Cystoscopy performed in TVT group
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information