de Leval 2011.
Methods | QRCT of TVT‐O vs modified TVT‐O | |
Participants | 175 women Inclusion criteria: women aged 25‐85 years with USI; positive stress test with at least a maximum cystometric capacity of 300 ml Exclusion criteria: DO or detrusor acontractility; neurogenic bladder; or POP stage 3 or above Mean age years (SD): Group A: 60.0 (11.7); Group B: 57.2 (2.7) BMI kg/m² (SD): Group A: 26.4 (4.8) Group B: 26.8 (5.3) Previous surgery for SUI: Group A: 4/87; B Group: 4/88 Previous surgery for POP: Group A: 4/87; Group B: 2/88 |
|
Interventions | Group A: TVT‐O (n = 87) Group B: modified TVT‐O (n = 88) |
|
Outcomes | At 1 ‐year follow‐up:
At 3‐year follow‐up:
|
|
Notes | The modified TVT‐O was shortened to a total tape length of 12 cm and had a reduction in the depth of lateral dissection, the obturator membrane was not perforated with the scissors or the guide Follow‐up assessments carried out at 1, 6, 12 months, and 3 years Lost to follow‐up:
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Quote: "The randomisation process was performed with five sequential patients undergoing one approach before alternating surgical modality" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Patients were blinded to the type of surgery they underwent |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "no patients withdrew from the study prior to their operation". 2 participants were completely lost to follow‐up after the 1‐month visit and 2 more after the 6‐month visit. One patient died before the 6‐month visit; the cause of death was unrelated to the surgery |