Elbadry 2014.

Methods	RCT of adjustable TOT vs TOT
Participants	96 women with SUI, with a mean age of 53 + 9.9 years
Interventions	Group A: adjustable TOT (n = 48) Group B: TOT: (n = 48)
Outcomes	Cure Mean operative time Operative blood loss bladder injury number of tape ajdustments Length of hospital stay
Notes	The advantage of the adjustable tape is that it can be adjusted postoperatively to address over‐ or under‐correction
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Quote: "Patients were randomized into 2 equal groups"
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	No information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	No information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	No information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	No information