Kamel 2009.
Methods | RCT of TVT vs TVT‐O | |
Participants | 120 women Inclusion criteria: women with urodynamically proven SUI and urethral hypermobility Exclusion criteria: not defined |
|
Interventions | A: TVT (n = 60) B: TVT‐O (n = 60) |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | TVT group underwent cystoscopy | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Stated: "randomised" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |