Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 31;2017(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4

Kamel 2009.

Methods RCT of TVT vs TVT‐O
Participants 120 women
Inclusion criteria: women with urodynamically proven SUI and urethral hypermobility
Exclusion criteria: not defined
Interventions A: TVT (n = 60)
B: TVT‐O (n = 60)
Outcomes
  • Objective cure

  • Bladder perforation

  • Vascular injury

  • Mean operative time

Notes TVT group underwent cystoscopy
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Stated: "randomised"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information