Lee 2007.
Methods | RCT of TVT versus TVT‐O | |
Participants | 120 women Inclusion criteria: women with USI Exclusion criteria: predominant urge incontinence or POP Women had similar characteristics with regard to age, parity, incontinence symptoms and menopausal status |
|
Interventions | Group A: TVT (n = 60) Group B: TVT‐O (n = 60) |
|
Outcomes |
Follow‐up was for 12 months |
|
Notes | Cystoscopy was performed only in the TVT group Mean follow‐up 13 months |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Quote: "Patients were alternately assigned to the TVT or TVT‐O group" (Randomisation was by alternation method) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Not concealed |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |