Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 31;2017(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4

Oliveira 2006.

Methods RCT of TVT‐O and TVT
Participants 45 women
Inclusion criteria: women with SUI with and without ISD
Exclusion criteria: women with stage 2 or more POP, women with ISD
Mean age of 53.9 years
Participants had preoperative UDS diagnosis
Interventions Group A: TVT (n = 17)
 Group B: TVT‐O (n = 28)
Outcomes
  • Objective cure by UDS: negative stress test at UDS and pad testing

  • Complications

Notes Follow‐up 12 months
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "...women with SUI were randomly assigned ..."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information