Rechberger 2011.
Methods | RCT of standard TOT vs TOT with 2‐point tape fixation sutures to prevent tape displacement | |
Participants | 463 women Inclusion criteria: women with urodynamically proven SUI, Including women with ISD Exclusion criteria: OAB, MUI Mean age (years; SD): Group A: 55.8 (11.3); Group B: 54.8 (9.8) Mean BMI kg/m² (SD): Group A: 28.9 (6.7); Group B: 28.2 (3.8) ISD: Group A: 41/232; Group B: 42/231 |
|
Interventions | Group A: TOT (n = 232) Group B: TOT with fixation (n = 231) |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Both tapes were monofilament Lost to follow‐up: Group A: 19/232; Group B: 26/231 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "Patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information |