Riva 2006.

Methods	RCT TVT versus TOT
Participants	Inclusion criteria: SUI with urethral hypermobility; age 40‐85 years; urethro‐cystocoele of grade 0‐2 Exclusion criteria: previous prolapse or IU surgery; anterior or posterior vaginal wall repair with mesh No difference recorded between the 2 groups for age, parity, or incontinence severity
Interventions	Group A: TOT (n = 65) Group B: TVT (n = 66)
Outcomes	Gynaecological examination, full urodynamic evaluation, voiding diary and KHQ were performed pre‐ and postoperatively
Notes	12‐month follow‐up
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Quote: "A randomised study". No description of how randomisation was achieved or if allocation was concealed
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	No information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	No information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	No information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	No information