Skip to main content
. 2004 Jul 19;2004(3):CD003269. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003269.pub2

8. AC/BA combination vs BA ‐ other outcomes.

Study Design&Duration Comb:BA ratio Outcomes Pooled summary stats SIngle study results Stat sig? Comment
Wolstenholme 1989
 
 Tammivaara 1993 Crossover trial
 4 weeks
 
 Crossover trial
 3 weeks 1:1
 
 1:1
 ORAL CR
 terbutaline Patient preference   OR 0.79
 95%CI 0.20, 3.06
 
 OR 1.70
 95%CI 0.40, 7.20 N
 
 
 N 1.3 times worse with AC/BA
 
 1.7 times better with AC/BA
Philip Joet 1990 Parallel design
 8 weeks 1:2 Number of patients with exacerbations   OR 1.70 
 95%CI 0.64, 4.51 N 1.7 times worse with AC/BA
Tammivaara 1993 Crossover trial
 3 weeks 1:1 CR
 ORAL terbutaline Number of patients with exacerbations
 
 No. withdrawing due to treatment failure   OR 0.32
 95%CI 0.01, 8.24
 
 OR 0.32
 95%CI 0.01, 8.24 N
 
 
 N 3 times better with AC/BA
 
 3 times better with AC/BA
Rebuck 1983 Crossover trial
 4 weeks 1:1 No. withdrawing due to treatment failure   OR 2.10
 95%CI 0.18, 25.01 N 2 times worse with AC/BA
Haahtela 1991 Parallel trial
 12 weeks 1:1 Duovent / Sal No. withdrawing due to treatment failure   OR 5.09
 95%CI 0.98, 26.43 N 5 times worse with AC/BA
Haahtela 1991 Philip‐Joet 1990 Parallel trial 12 weeks Parallel trial 8 weeks 1:2 Berod/Sal 1:2 Berod/Sal Number of patients withdrawing due to treatment failure OR 1.40 95%CI 0.69, 2.84 2 studies, 256 patients; Heterogen. p=0.22, I‐squared =32.2%   N 1.4 times worse with AC/BA