Table II.

The effect of G2G on HIV preventive motivation profiles at 3 months post- intervention (n=273)

	High motivationb (29.4%)		High condom use motivationc (39.5%)
	aORa	P-value	aORa	P-value
Intervention	2.56	0.05	1.12	0.85
Attitudes toward condom use (Baseline)	1.54	0.29	7.31	<.001
Sexual experience (Baseline)	0.46	0.13	1.50	0.40
Intervention*Sexual experience (Baseline)	0.29	0.11	0.79	0.78

^aAdjusted Odds Ratio

^bYouth in this class have a 0.9 probability of having a positive attitude towards abstinence and condom use, a 0.6 probability of having positive subjective norms about abstinence and condom use, a 0.9 probability of perceiving abstinence as easy or very easy, and 0.7 probability of perceiving condom use as easy or very easy

^cYouth in this class have high probability of endorsing condom use related items but low probability of endorsing abstinence related items

For both models, low motivation class is the reference class