Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 25.
Published in final edited form as: Child Abuse Negl. 2014 Sep 2;39:123–136. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.08.006

Table 5.

Multinomial logistic regression models estimating the relative odds of sexual victimization (online and in-person) given one’s sexual identity and gender identity, as well as social support among youth who have online friends (n=2131)

Personal characteristics Model 1: Relative odds of victimization given sexual and gender identity
Model 2: +Social support
Generalized sexual victimization
Sexual harassment
Generalized sexual victimization
Sexual harassment
Outcome: Online sexual victimization aOR (95% CI) p-Value aOR (95% CI) p-Value aOR (95% CI) p-Value aOR (95% CI) p-Value
 Sexual identity
  Heterosexual 1.0 (RG) 1.0 (RG) 1.0 (RG) 1.0 (RG)
  GLQ 3.40 (2.20, 5.25) <0.001 5.31 (2.77, 10.17) <0.001 3.14 (2.05, 4.82) <0.001 4.91 (2.54, 9.47) <0.001
  Bisexual 3.20 (2.10, 4.88) <0.001 3.95 (2.01, 7.75) <0.001 2.93 (1.93, 4.46) <0.001 3.77 (1.88, 7.55) <0.001
  QUO 1.76 (0.91, 3.43) 0.094 1.04 (0.33, 3.31) 0.946 1.66 (0.86, 3.22) 0.134 0.95 (0.29, 3.06) 0.925
 Gender minority (versus cisgender) 1.28 (0.70, 2.34) 0.422 1.88 (0.93, 3.79) 0.077 1.25 (0.69, 2.27) 0.467 1.95 (0.99, 3.84) 0.052
 In-person social support 1.00 (0.97, 1.03) 0.991 0.96 (0.92, 1.01) 0.084
 Online social support 1.04 (1.01, 1.07) 0.019 1.03 (0.99, 1.08) 0.173

Personal characteristics Generalized sexual victimization
Sexual harassment
Generalized sexual victimization
Sexual harassment
Outcome: In-person sexual victimization aOR (95% CI) p-Value aOR (95% CI) p-Value aOR (95% CI) p-Value aOR (95% CI) p-Value

 Sexual identity
  Heterosexual 1.0 (RG) 1.0 (RG) 1.0 (RG) 1.0 (RG)
  GLQ 2.33 (1.48, 3.66) <0.001 5.06 (2.75, 9.33) <0.001 2.17 (1.41, 3.35) <0.001 4.93 (2.63, 9.25) <0.001
  Bisexual 2.60 (1.71, 3.95) <0.001 3.86 (2.01, 7.40) <0.001 2.43 (1.60, 3.69) <0.001 3.89 (1.99, 7.61) <0.001
  QUO 1.15 (0.57, 2.32)  0.690 0.81 (0.25, 2.59) 0.720 1.07 (0.52, 2.18) 0.858 0.76 (0.24, 2.46) 0.650
 Gender minority (versus cisgender) 1.36 (0.74, 2.48)  0.318 1.69 (0.85, 3.35) 0.134 1.34 (0.74, 2.43) 0.336 1.76 (0.90, 3.43) 0.099
 In-person social support 0.98 (0.94, 1.02) 0.377 0.95 (0.91, 0.99) 0.009
 Online social support 1.04 (1.00, 1.08) 0.067 1.02 (0.97, 1.06) 0.466

Note. Two separate victimization types assessed: Online sexual victimization and in-person sexual victimization. The two categories (generalized sexual victimization and sexual harassment) are compared to reporting no sexual victimization in the past year using multinomial logistic regression. For each victimization type, the relative odds of victimization are estimated given one’s sexual and gender identities (Model 1); and then social support is added to the model to determine its relative influence on the relation between victimization and sexual and gender identity (Model 2). All models are adjusted for: age, race, ethnicity, income, urbanicity, major depressive symptomatology and survey process measures. QUO = Questioning, unsure, and youth of other sexual identities. GLQ = Gay, Lesbian, and Queer youth; aOR = Adjusted Odds Ratio. 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval.