Breier 2002.
Methods | Allocation: randomised. Blindness: double. Duration: 24 hours. |
|
Participants | Diagnosis: schizophrenia, schizophreniform or schizoaffective disorder. N = 270. Age: range 18‐73 years. Sex: 155 males, 115 females. History: "recently hospitalised with acute agitation." Mean age at onset of illness 25.1 (SD 7.3) years. Excluded: people with "significant medical disorders, including alcohol and/or drug dependency, were excluded from this trial." Setting: Multi‐centre (Croatia, Italy, Romania and South Africa). |
|
Interventions | 1. Haloperidol IM: dose up to 3 injections of 7.5 mg/IM (mean number of IMs not reported, mean dose 9.9 mg (SD 4.6). N = 40. 2. Olanzapine IM: dose up to 3 injections of 2.5 mg/IM (mean number of IMs not reported, mean dose 4 mg (SD 1.5). N = 48. 3. Olanzapine IM: dose up to 3 injections of 5 mg/IM (mean number of IMs not reported, mean dose 6.9 mg (SD 2.7). N = 45. 4. Olanzapine IM: dose up to 3 injections of 7.5 mg/IM (mean number of IMs not reported, mean dose 9.8 mg (SD 3.8). N = 46. 5. Olanzapine IM: dose up to 3 injections of 10 mg/IM (mean number of IMs not reported, mean dose 12.6 mg (SD 4.9). N = 46*. 6. Placebo IM. N = 50. 2nd injection allowed 2 hours after 1st, 3rd injection allowed 4 hours after 2nd injection. Both to be administered within 20 hours of 1st injection. Need for subsequent doses at the discretion of the investigator. |
|
Outcomes | Mental state: BPRS Total, BPRS Positive. Global state: CGI‐S, additional injections, need for benzodiazepine. Agitation: ABS, PANSS‐EC. Adverse events: QT interval at 24 hours, hypotension**, acute dystonia**, EPS**. Unable to use*** ‐ Leaving the study early: reasons are not given for why participants did not complete the study. Adverse effects: SAS (mean, SE/SD not reported). Adverse effects: BAS (mean, SE/SD not reported). Adverse effects: need for anticholinergic therapy (olanzapine 10 mg/IM not reported). Adverse effects: QT interval at 2 hours (mean, SE/SD not reported). |
|
Notes | * For data analysis, where continuous outcomes were used, haloperidol was compared with Olanzapine 10 mg/IM as this is the dose referred to as usual by the BNF (BNF 2011). ** It is possible that this binary data was derived from the BAS scale. *** Additional data are reported by dose but not used in this review (Table 52; Table 53; Table 54; Table 55; Table 56) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Described as randomised ‐ method of randomisation is not reported. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | "Allocation concealed placebo‐controlled trial." Method of randomisation not reported. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "unblinded third‐party personnel, who played no role in evaluating patients, were trained to handle and administer injections in identical, unmarked syringes." "Investigators, patients, clinical carers and raters were blinded." |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "Investigators, patients, clinical carers and raters were blinded." |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Reasons why all participants that left the study early were not reported. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | It is not clear whether all side effects are reported. |
Other bias | High risk | Trial sponsored by manufacturers of olanzapine IM. |