Dorevitch 1999.
Methods | Allocation: randomised. Blindness: double. Duration: 2 hours. |
|
Participants | Diagnosis: DSM‐IV diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia (N = 19), schizoaffective disorder (N = 7), bipolar disorder (N = 2). N = 28. Age: range 20‐60 years. Sex: 13 males, 15 females. History: "actively psychotic inpatients". (p.142). Excluded: Not reported. Setting: Psychiatric hospital, Tel Aviv. |
|
Interventions | 1. Haloperidol: dose 5 mg/IM (mean number of IMs not reported). N = 13. 2. Flunitrazepam: dose 1 mg/IM (mean number of IMs not reported). N = 15. |
|
Outcomes | Global state: need for seclusion or restraint. Aggression: OAS. Adverse effects. |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "assigned by a table of random numbers." (p.142). |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Described as double‐blind, however further details regarding the blinding of participants and personnel are not reported. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "All ratings were completed by the same rater (N.K.), who was blind to the study medications." (p.143). |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No evidence of incomplete outcome data. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | It is not clear whether all side effects are reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Small short study. |