Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 31;2017(7):CD009377. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009377.pub3

Dorevitch 1999.

Methods Allocation: randomised.
Blindness: double.
Duration: 2 hours.
Participants Diagnosis: DSM‐IV diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia (N = 19), schizoaffective disorder (N = 7), bipolar disorder (N = 2).
N = 28.
Age: range 20‐60 years.
Sex: 13 males, 15 females.
History: "actively psychotic inpatients". (p.142).
Excluded: Not reported.
Setting: Psychiatric hospital, Tel Aviv.
Interventions 1. Haloperidol: dose 5 mg/IM (mean number of IMs not reported). N = 13.
2. Flunitrazepam: dose 1 mg/IM (mean number of IMs not reported). N = 15.
Outcomes Global state: need for seclusion or restraint.
Aggression: OAS.
Adverse effects.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "assigned by a table of random numbers." (p.142).
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Described as double‐blind, however further details regarding the blinding of participants and personnel are not reported.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "All ratings were completed by the same rater (N.K.), who was blind to the study medications." (p.143).
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No evidence of incomplete outcome data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk It is not clear whether all side effects are reported.
Other bias Unclear risk Small short study.