Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 31;2017(7):CD009377. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009377.pub3

Li 2006.

Methods Allocation: randomised.
Blindness: single.
Duration: 72 hours.
Participants Diagnosis: CCMD‐3 diagnosis of schizophrenia with agitation/aggression.
N = 231.
Age: mean 34 (SD 12) years.
Sex: males and females.
History: mean length of illness, haloperidol group 30 (± 68) months, ziprasidone 18 (± 35) months.
Excluded: severe physical or neurological impairment/diseases; drug or alcohol abuse, dependence, pregnant women.
Setting: not reported.
Interventions 1. Haloperidol: flexible dose 5 mg/IM to 10 mg/IM, repeated every 4‐6 hours if necessary, maximum dose 30 mg during 24 hours. N = 116.
2. Ziprasidone: flexible dose 10 mg/IM to 20 mg/IM, repeated every 4‐6 hours if necessary, maximum dose 40 mg during 24 hours. N = 115.
Outcomes Mental state: PANSS endpoint.
Agitation: PANSS‐EC.
Adverse effects: TESS.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Described as randomised ‐ method of randomisation is not reported.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Single‐blind – however the author did not state who had been blinded.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Single‐blind – however the author did not state who had been blinded.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No incomplete data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk TESS and SAS were used for assessment of adverse events.  No continuous data were reported from either scales, but binary outcomes for adverse events were reported.
Other bias Unclear risk None obvious.