Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 27;2017(7):CD002239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002239.pub3
Study Reason for exclusion
Foote 2007 Randomisation broke down when one recruitment source only referred participants for laparoscopic procedure. This led to the study continuing as a cohort study to two surgical techniques, so was excluded from this review
Koster 1996 Comparing two‐dimensional view laparoscopy to three‐dimensional laparoscopy for different gynaecological operations; n = 3 for colposuspension, all randomly allocated to one group
Lee 1997 Comparison of the clinical course and results between laparoscopic and open Burch colposuspension. Not a randomised study
Lernis 1997 Not a randomised study and only reporting experience with laparoscopic colposuspension technique
Salam 2004 Comparison of operative complications and early results between laparoscopic and open colposuspension. Design not stated and not a randomised study