Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Foote 2007 | Randomisation broke down when one recruitment source only referred participants for laparoscopic procedure. This led to the study continuing as a cohort study to two surgical techniques, so was excluded from this review |
Koster 1996 | Comparing two‐dimensional view laparoscopy to three‐dimensional laparoscopy for different gynaecological operations; n = 3 for colposuspension, all randomly allocated to one group |
Lee 1997 | Comparison of the clinical course and results between laparoscopic and open Burch colposuspension. Not a randomised study |
Lernis 1997 | Not a randomised study and only reporting experience with laparoscopic colposuspension technique |
Salam 2004 | Comparison of operative complications and early results between laparoscopic and open colposuspension. Design not stated and not a randomised study |