Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 7;2017(7):CD006401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006401.pub4
Methods * Design: RCT
* Randomization process: nr * Blinding: double * Concealment of allocation: nr * Setting: 14 pediatric clinics (13 USA, 1 Finland) * Country: USA, Finland * Follow‐up: 24 and 48 weeks
Participants * Participants with HeFH (N = 132) * Diagnosis: LDL‐C > 4.9mmol/L and 1 parent LDL‐C > 4.9mmol/l; or LDL‐C > 5.7mmol/L and CAD death in 1 parent * Inclusion: age 10 ‐ 17 years; LDL‐C 4.9 ‐ 13.0 mmol/L on diet and ≧ 1 parent with LDL‐C ≧ 4.9 mmol/L with or LDL‐C 5.7 ‐ 13.0 mmol/L on diet and a parent died of CAD; (Tanner > I required later by FDA > 8 participants needed to discontinue) * Exclusion: delayed puberty; under/overweight; HoFH; secondary hyperlipidaemia; TG disorders * Base population: unclear * Age: 11 ‐ 17 years * Male: 100% * Race: 93% * Height (mean): 159 cm * Weight (mean): 52 kg * BMI (mean): 21 kg/m² * LDLC (mean): 6.5 mmol/L
Interventions * Treatment: lovastatin 40 mg in the evening (n = 63); started with 10 mg, increased to 20/40 mg at weeks 8/16 * Control: placebo (n = 59) * Run‐in: diet for 4 months; placebo run‐in for 4 weeks * Diet: AHA pediatric diet; instructed, monitored and evaluated throughout trial
Outcomes LDL‐C: enzymatic method TC: enzymatic method HDL‐C: heparin‐manganese chloride method TG: enzymatic method ALAT > 3 x ULN: samples analyzed centrally ASAT > 3 x ULN: samples analyzed centrally CK > 10 x ULN: samples analyzed centrally Myalgia criteria: nr Adverse event: new or worsening clinical adverse event, not otherwise specified
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Described as randomized, process not reported.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk nr
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Double blind
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Compliance: nr Dropout: 8% Losses to follow‐up: 8% Missing from analysis: 8%
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No indication to suspect selective reporting.