| Methods | * Design: RCT * Randomization process: nr * Blinding: double * Concealment of allocation: nr * Setting: 14 pediatric clinics (13 USA, 1 Finland) * Country: USA, Finland * Follow‐up: 24 and 48 weeks |
|
| Participants | * Participants with HeFH (N = 132) * Diagnosis: LDL‐C > 4.9mmol/L and 1 parent LDL‐C > 4.9mmol/l; or LDL‐C > 5.7mmol/L and CAD death in 1 parent * Inclusion: age 10 ‐ 17 years; LDL‐C 4.9 ‐ 13.0 mmol/L on diet and ≧ 1 parent with LDL‐C ≧ 4.9 mmol/L with or LDL‐C 5.7 ‐ 13.0 mmol/L on diet and a parent died of CAD; (Tanner > I required later by FDA > 8 participants needed to discontinue) * Exclusion: delayed puberty; under/overweight; HoFH; secondary hyperlipidaemia; TG disorders * Base population: unclear * Age: 11 ‐ 17 years * Male: 100% * Race: 93% * Height (mean): 159 cm * Weight (mean): 52 kg * BMI (mean): 21 kg/m² * LDLC (mean): 6.5 mmol/L | |
| Interventions | * Treatment: lovastatin 40 mg in the evening (n = 63); started with 10 mg, increased to 20/40 mg at weeks 8/16 * Control: placebo (n = 59) * Run‐in: diet for 4 months; placebo run‐in for 4 weeks * Diet: AHA pediatric diet; instructed, monitored and evaluated throughout trial | |
| Outcomes | LDL‐C: enzymatic method TC: enzymatic method HDL‐C: heparin‐manganese chloride method TG: enzymatic method ALAT > 3 x ULN: samples analyzed centrally ASAT > 3 x ULN: samples analyzed centrally CK > 10 x ULN: samples analyzed centrally Myalgia criteria: nr Adverse event: new or worsening clinical adverse event, not otherwise specified | |
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Described as randomized, process not reported. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | nr |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double blind |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Compliance: nr Dropout: 8% Losses to follow‐up: 8% Missing from analysis: 8% |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No indication to suspect selective reporting. |