Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 7;2017(7):CD006401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006401.pub4
Methods * Design: RCT * Randomization process: nr * Blinding: double * Concealment of allocation: nr * Setting: 1 research clinic * Country: Canada * Follow‐up: 6 weeks
Participants * Individuals with HeFH (N = 63) * Diagnosis: unclear, LDL‐C > 95th percentile on diet * Inclusion: age < 18 years; HeFH; LDL‐C > 95th percentile on diet; * Exclusion: DM; anorexia; kidney, liver or thyroid disorder; delayed puberty * Base population: all potential participants screened * Age 8 ‐ 17 years * Male 59% * Race: nr * Height (mean) 153 cm * weight (mean) 46 kg * BMI (mean) nr * LDL‐C (mean) 5.8 mmol/L
Interventions * Treatment: simvastatin 20 mg daily (n = 47) * Control: placebo (n = 16) * Run‐in: placebo 4 weeks * Diet: AHA phase I, dietary counselling throughout the trial
Outcomes LDL‐C: enzymatic method, calculated Friedewald's formula TC: enzymatic method HDL‐C: heparin‐manganese chloride method TG: enzymatic method
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Described as randomized, process not reported.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk nr
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Double blind
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Compliance: nr Dropout: nr Losses to follow‐up: 0% Missing from analysis: 0%
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No indication to suspect selective reporting.