| Methods | * Design: RCT * Randomization process: nr * Blinding: double * Concealment of allocation: nr * Setting: 1 research clinic * Country: Canada * Follow‐up: 6 weeks | |
| Participants | * Individuals with HeFH (N = 63) * Diagnosis: unclear, LDL‐C > 95th percentile on diet * Inclusion: age < 18 years; HeFH; LDL‐C > 95th percentile on diet; * Exclusion: DM; anorexia; kidney, liver or thyroid disorder; delayed puberty * Base population: all potential participants screened * Age 8 ‐ 17 years * Male 59% * Race: nr * Height (mean) 153 cm * weight (mean) 46 kg * BMI (mean) nr * LDL‐C (mean) 5.8 mmol/L | |
| Interventions | * Treatment: simvastatin 20 mg daily (n = 47) * Control: placebo (n = 16) * Run‐in: placebo 4 weeks * Diet: AHA phase I, dietary counselling throughout the trial | |
| Outcomes | LDL‐C: enzymatic method, calculated Friedewald's formula TC: enzymatic method HDL‐C: heparin‐manganese chloride method TG: enzymatic method | |
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Described as randomized, process not reported. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | nr |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double blind |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Compliance: nr Dropout: nr Losses to follow‐up: 0% Missing from analysis: 0% |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No indication to suspect selective reporting. |