Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 25;2017(7):CD002912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002912.pub7

Bandarian 2011.

Methods RCT; simple randomisation method
Participants N = 62 (Burch = 31, TOT = 31)
Incl: proven SUI who were candidates for surgery for the first time, did not respond to treatment
Excl: chronic disease such as collagen vascular disease, neuropathy, coagulopathy, history of urogenital cancer, pregnancy, history of pelvic radiation, previous surgery for incontinence, urge incontinence, urodynamic detrusor overactivity or genital prolapse of POP‐Q stage II or more
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Tehran, Iran
Interventions Burch colposuspension (N = 31)
TOT (N = 31)
All procedures done by one surgeon
No description of the interventions
Outcomes Cure: absence of urinary incontinence
Improvement: urinary incontinence less than once in two weeks
Failure: urinary incontinence more than once a week
(note: paper states "long term outcome" but did not specify any particular time of assessment)
Surgical complications such as bleeding, urethral and bladder damage, urinary retention, urinary infection, wound infection, vaginal erosion, pelvic hematoma
Hospital stay
Operation time
Patient satisfaction (asked to express using rate of very satisfied, moderately satisfied, less satisfied and unsatisfied)
Mean duration of follow‐up:
Burch: 28 months (12‐38)
TOT: 22 months (8‐26)
(note: no specific time of follow up specified in the methods)
Post‐operative follow‐up done by a senior surgeon who did not take part in the operation
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "simple randomisation"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk not mentioned in the paper
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk not mentioned in the paper
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk "all procedures performed by one surgeon" but no mention specifically regarding blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk "follow up was done by a senior surgeon who did not take part in the operation" but no mention specifically regarding blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk timing of follow‐up was not clearly defined and there is a difference in the mean between the two groups
Other bias Unclear risk no other bias identified