Drahoradova 2004.

Methods	RCT. Method not described. Two arms Unblinded. Unclear if ITT. Follow‐up at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Participants	N = 139. No withdrawals mentioned No mention if diagnosis of SUI was by symptom alone or by urodynamics No inclusion or exclusion criteria mentioned Baseline comparison of groups by age, BMI, parity Single centre. Ob&Gyne. Czech Republic
Interventions	I: Burch (60) II:TVT (79) No description of technique
Outcomes	Recurrence of SUI (3 mo, 1 year); IQOL; de novo urge incontinence; de novo urge symptoms; voiding difficulties; TVT erosions
Notes	Abstract
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Unclear risk	method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	not mentioned
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes	High risk	unblinded
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	unblinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes	High risk	unblinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	no withdrawals mentioned; complete follow‐up
Other bias	Unclear risk	no other bias identified