Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 5;2017(7):CD003414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003414.pub3

Greco 2016.

Methods Single‐centre, 2‐arm, parallel RCT
Computer‐generated random sequence, unclear method of allocation concealment
Participants 236 women
Inclusion criteria: maternal age < 42 years, regular menstrual cycle, normal intrauterine cavity, the presence of at least one vitrified euploid blastocyst obtained after ICSI followed by preimplantation genetic diagnosis by aCGH, and a consent to undergo a frozen‐thawed single transfer in a modified‐natural cycle (NC) or after hormonal endometrium preparation (AC_FET)
Exclusion criteria: ovulation disorders, BMI > 29 kg/m2, endometriosis grade
≥ III according to the American Fertility Society criteria, and the use of testicular sperm for ICSI
Interventions Modified natural cycle FET (natural cycle with HCG trigger)
Modified natural cycle: natural cycle was modified by triggering of ovulation using HCG injection then supporting luteal phase by progesterone injections
Artificial cycle FET (HT + GnRHa suppression)
GnRH agonist injection was started in preceding cycle to prevent follicular development
Then estrogen tablets accompanied by progesterone injections were used
Outcomes Live birth rate per woman
Miscarriage rate per woman
Clinical pregnancy rate per woman
Endometrial thickness
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Described as, "Computer‐generated, not cancelled simple randomization"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding was not used due to the nature of the interventions; no information on outcome assessment; however, non‐blinding of outcome assessors may not have affected some of the outcome measures as they were objectively assessed.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Proportions of withdrawals and reasons for withdrawals or exclusion were fairly balanced between the two groups.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk There were discrepancies in the outcomes between pre‐specified and reported outcomes
Other bias Unclear risk Insuficient information to make a conclusive judgement