Brandalize 2011.
Methods | Controlled before‐and‐after study design | |
Participants | Eligibility: students had to be enrolled in public school, be in an afternoon 6th grade class in 2008, be in an afternoon or morning 7th grade class in 2009, and be between 12‐16 years old. Participants: 379 students |
|
Interventions | Comparison of students who shifted from afternoon (13:00 to 17:30) to morning (07:30 to 12:00) classes right after the July vacation in 2009, to those that remained in afternoon classes. | |
Outcomes |
Outcome measurement:
|
|
Notes | Funding sources: supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | CBA study; high risk by definition |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | CBA study; high risk by definition |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding of participants or personnel mentioned; participants knew their start time |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Attrition was not addressed in the paper |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No evidence that some outcomes were not reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No evidence of other biases |
Similarity of baseline measures (RCT/CBA only) | Low risk | Pretest differences accounted for in analyses through use of covariates |
Similarity of baseline characteristics (RCT/CBA only) | Unclear risk | No report of characteristics is given; analyses divided by sex |
Diffusion of treatment effects (RCT/CBA only) | Low risk | Students were assigned to different start times; start times are not subject to diffusion as a treatment |