Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Alvim 2005 | 1. Randomisation unclear 2. Interventions not relevant 3. Outcomes not relevant |
Beiter Jr 2001 | 1. Study not RCT or quasi‐RCT 2. Interventions not relevant |
Charache 1981 | 1. Study not RCT or quasi‐RCT 2. Interventions not relevant |
Charache 1983 | 1. Study not RCT or quasi‐RCT 2. Interventions not relevant |
de Araujo 1994 | 1. Group allocation not clear (contacted authors several times for clarification, but to date have received no reply) |
Gonzalez 1988 | 1. Interventions not relevant |
Gonzalez 1991 | 1. Study not RCT or quasi‐RCT 2. Interventions not relevant |
Guy 1971 | 1. Study not RCT or quasi‐RCT 2. Interventions not relevant |
Guy 1973 | 1. Study not RCT or quasi‐RCT |
Hardwick Jr 1999 | 1. Interventions not relevant |
Hatch 1965 | 1. Study not RCT or quasi‐RCT 2. Interventions not relevant |
Kalinyak 2005 | 1. Participants not relevant 2. Interventions not relevant |
Nalbandian 1971 | 1. Study not RCT or quasi‐RCT 2. Interventions not relevant |
Orringer 2001 | 1. Interventions not relevant |
Oski 1965 | 1. Study not RCT or quasi‐RCT 2. Interventions not relevant |
Rhodes 1974 | 1. Interventions not relevant |
RCT: randomised controlled trial