Dale 2009.
Methods | Design: Randomised, double blind, two‐period cross‐over study. After titration of dose, participants randomised to receive either a single dose of MIR at bedtime followed by another dose 4 h later, or a double dose of MIR with a placebo dose 4 h later Duration: 2 x 1 night on each treatment Setting: hospital inpatients |
|
Participants | Cancer pain N = 22 (19 completed) M 11, F 8 Mean age 57 years (45 ‐ 74) |
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes | PI: 11‐point NRS Participant preference BPI, Edmonton symptom assessment scale |
|
Notes | Oxford Quality Score: R = 2, DB = 2, W = 1. Total = 5/5 | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "concealed procedure performed by hospital pharmacist using restricted randomisation table" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | "concealed procedure performed by hospital pharmacist using restricted randomisation table" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "placebo tablets identical in appearance and taste" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "placebo tablets identical in appearance and taste" |
Incomplete adverse event outcome data‐ patient level | Unclear risk | Adverse events reported with patient numbers but not clear if everything was reported |
Selective reporting bias for adverse events | Unclear risk | Only mean data with no denominator |
Size | High risk | < 50 participants per treatment arm |