Skip to main content
. 2014 May 29;2014(5):CD011056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011056.pub2

Dale 2009.

Methods Design: Randomised, double blind, two‐period cross‐over study. After titration of dose, participants randomised to receive either a single dose of MIR at bedtime followed by another dose 4 h later, or a double dose of MIR with a placebo dose 4 h later
Duration: 2 x 1 night on each treatment
Setting: hospital inpatients
Participants Cancer pain
N = 22 (19 completed)
M 11, F 8
Mean age 57 years (45 ‐ 74)
Interventions
  1. MIR single dose at bedtime and after 4 hours

  2. MIR double dose at bedtime and placebo after 4 hours

Outcomes PI: 11‐point NRS
Participant preference
 BPI, Edmonton symptom assessment scale
Notes Oxford Quality Score: R = 2, DB = 2, W = 1. Total = 5/5
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "concealed procedure performed by hospital pharmacist using restricted randomisation table"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "concealed procedure performed by hospital pharmacist using restricted randomisation table"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "placebo tablets identical in appearance and taste"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "placebo tablets identical in appearance and taste"
Incomplete adverse event outcome data‐ patient level Unclear risk Adverse events reported with patient numbers but not clear if everything was reported
Selective reporting bias for adverse events Unclear risk Only mean data with no denominator
Size High risk < 50 participants per treatment arm