Heiskanen 1997.
Methods | Design: Randomised, double‐blind (double dummy), two‐phase cross‐over study. Prestudy open label titration phase (maximum 21 days) to achieve effective pain relief with acceptable adverse effects for ≥ 48 hours Duration: 2 x 3 ‐ 6 days + titration phase up to 21 days Setting: Not stated |
|
Participants | Chronic cancer pain requiring opioid analgesics N = 45 (27 analysed) M 16, F 11 Mean age 60 years (range 39 ‐ 76) |
|
Interventions |
Dose adjustment allowed Rescue medication: Oxycodone IR or MIR in a dose of approximately 1/6 to 1/8 of the daily dose of controlled‐release formulation Stable NSAIDs continued at the same dose |
|
Outcomes | PI: 4‐point VRS (none, slight, moderate, severe) x 4 daily Acceptability of therapy: 5‐point VRS (very poor, poor, fair, good, excellent) x 2 daily Adverse events Modified Specific Drug Effect Questionnaire: participants and investigator, at end of study |
|
Notes | Oxford Quality Score: R = 2, DB = 2, W = 1. Total = 5/5 | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "Computer generated randomisation for the open‐label titration phase and again for the double‐blind phase was performed by the Purdue Frederick Company and a list of randomisation codes was kept by the hospital pharmacist" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | "list of randomisation codes was kept by the hospital pharmacy". Probably adequate |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double dummy method, "matched placebo tablets" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double dummy method, "matched placebo tablets" |
Incomplete adverse event outcome data‐ patient level | High risk | AEs reported on fewer than 90% participants |
Selective reporting bias for adverse events | Low risk | Appears to be a complete list |
Size | High risk | < 50 participants per treatment arm |