Skip to main content
. 2014 May 29;2014(5):CD011056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011056.pub2

Moriarty 1999.

Methods Design: multicentre, randomised, double blind (double dummy), two‐phase cross‐over study Participants stabilised on Mm/r during 1 ‐ 3 day run‐in to confirm stability of pain control
Duration: 2 x 3 days, plus pre‐study stabilisation. No washout
Setting: not stated
Participants Cancer pain adequately controlled with Mm/r
N = 100
M 53, F 47
Age > 18 years
Interventions
  1. Hydromorphone m/r

  2. Mm/r


No other opioids allowed, antiemetics permitted
Range of escape medication: MIR solution, diamorphine solution, diamorphine tablets and dextromoramide
Outcomes PI: VAS and 6‐point categorical scale
 Nausea: 4‐point scale
Participant preference
Notes Oxford Quality Score: R = 2, DB = 2, W = 1. Total = 5/5
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "randomisation schedule prepared by clinical supplies dept"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "matching placebos" "double dummy technique"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "matching placebos" "double dummy technique"
Incomplete adverse event outcome data‐ patient level High risk Not reported at patient level
Selective reporting bias for adverse events Low risk All events reported
Size Unclear risk 50 ‐ 199 participants per treatment group