Skip to main content
. 2014 May 29;2014(5):CD011056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011056.pub2

Panich 1993.

Methods Design: randomised, single blind, two‐phase cross‐over study
Duration 2 x 7 days, no washout
Setting: Pain clinic in Thailand
Participants Severe cancer pain
 N = 73 (49 reported)
Mean age 53 years (± 10)
Weight 46.5 kg (± 10.6)
Interventions
  1. Mm/r 10 mg or 30 mg 12‐hourly

  2. MIR solution (local formula) 5 ‐ 10 mg 4‐hourly


Paracetamol or narcotic injection for breakthrough pain
Outcomes Nurse assessment of pain: VAS
Nurse assessment of sleep duration: 4‐point categorical scale
Participant preference
Adverse events
Notes Oxford Quality Score: R = 1, DB = 0, W = 1. Total = 2/5
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "randomised into 2 groups" Method used to generate sequence not clearly stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Single blind ‐ nurse blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Single blind ‐ nurse blinded
Incomplete adverse event outcome data‐ patient level High risk <90% participants included
Selective reporting bias for adverse events High risk Selective reporting
Size High risk < 50 participants in each treatment arm (for analysis reported)