Panich 1993.
Methods | Design: randomised, single blind, two‐phase cross‐over study Duration 2 x 7 days, no washout Setting: Pain clinic in Thailand |
|
Participants | Severe cancer pain
N = 73 (49 reported) Mean age 53 years (± 10) Weight 46.5 kg (± 10.6) |
|
Interventions |
Paracetamol or narcotic injection for breakthrough pain |
|
Outcomes | Nurse assessment of pain: VAS Nurse assessment of sleep duration: 4‐point categorical scale Participant preference Adverse events |
|
Notes | Oxford Quality Score: R = 1, DB = 0, W = 1. Total = 2/5 | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "randomised into 2 groups" Method used to generate sequence not clearly stated |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Single blind ‐ nurse blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Single blind ‐ nurse blinded |
Incomplete adverse event outcome data‐ patient level | High risk | <90% participants included |
Selective reporting bias for adverse events | High risk | Selective reporting |
Size | High risk | < 50 participants in each treatment arm (for analysis reported) |