Skip to main content
. 2014 May 29;2014(5):CD011056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011056.pub2

Rodriguez 2007.

Methods Design: randomised, double blind, parallel group study
Duration: 2‐day run in, then 21‐day treatment period
Setting: not stated
Participants Persistent moderate or severe cancer pain (primarily gastric, breast, prostate, lung)
N = 177
M 88, F 89
Mean age 60 years
Interventions
  1. Codeine + paracetamol 150 mg + 2500 mg daily, n = 59

  2. Hydrocodone + paracetamol 25 mg + 2500 mg daily, n = 62

  3. Tramadol 200 mg daily, n = 56


If no PR (VAS ≥ 4/10) dose could be doubled. If this caused intolerable adverse events it could be reduced by 25%
Rescue medication:
Outcomes PI: 10 cm VAS
PR: five‐point scale (0‐4)
Adverse events
Withdrawals
Notes Oxford Quality Score: R = 2, DB = 2, W = 1. Total = 5/5
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "computer‐generated schedule"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "study drugs had similar characteristics such as color, shape, and dimensions and were packaged in identical containers"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "study drugs had similar characteristics such as color, shape, and dimensions and were packaged in identical containers"
Incomplete adverse event outcome data‐ patient level Low risk <90% participants included
Selective reporting bias for adverse events Low risk Comprehensive list
Size Unclear risk 50 ‐ 199 participants per treatment arm