Basak 2001.
Methods | Study type: individual RCT Randomisation method: not reported Blinding: not reported Intention‐to‐treat analysis used: not reported |
|
Participants |
Inclusion criteria of the trial
Exclusion criteria of the trial
Number of randomised participants: 60 in total (betamethasone N = 30, calcipotriol N = 30) Number of dropouts: 7, all from 1 treatment arm (23%) Sex: not reported Age: not reported Country: Turkey |
|
Interventions |
Treatment
Comparator/s
If there was only slight improvement at the end of 4 weeks, treatment was continued for another 4‐week period After cessation of treatment, participants entered a follow‐up period for 4 weeks Before the start of treatment, there was a 1‐week wash‐out period, during which only a mild non‐medicated shampoo was used |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Results were reported mainly at 4 weeks. The dropout rate was unbalanced and considerable | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | This was not reported in detail Quote: "randomly assigned" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | This was not reported |
Similarity of the study groups (selection bias) | Unclear risk | This was not reported in sufficient detail |
Blinding of participants (performance bias) | High risk | There was no mention of blinding in the report |
Blinding of care providers (performance bias) | High risk | There was no mention of blinding in the report |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | There was no mention of blinding in the report |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | More than 20% of participants withdrew from the calcipotriol arm |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Not all results related to predefined outcomes were reported in sufficient detail |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No other bias was identified |