Faergemann 1986.
Methods | Study type: individual RCT Randomisation method: not reported Blinding: double‐blind Intention‐to‐treat analysis used: not reported |
|
Participants |
Inclusion criteria of the trial
Exclusion criteria of the trial
Number of randomised participants: 70 participants in the whole study. In this review, we only considered the participants in the hydrocortisone (N = 24) and miconazole (N = 23) arms Number of dropouts: 3 (5%) Sex: 36 males, 34 females Mean age (range): 38 (21 to 69) years Country: Sweden |
|
Interventions |
Treatment
Comparator/s
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | The combination treatment arm of the trial was not included in this review. Adverse events were not reported | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "randomly allocated" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | This was not reported |
Similarity of the study groups (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Baseline data were not reported |
Blinding of participants (performance bias) | Unclear risk | Whilst the study was reported to be double‐blind, it was not clear who was blinded |
Blinding of care providers (performance bias) | Unclear risk | Whilst the study was reported to be double‐blind, it was not clear who was blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Whilst the study was reported to be double‐blind, it was not clear who was blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The number of dropouts was small |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Predefined outcomes were reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | The pharmaceutical industry provided the intervention solutions |