Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 29;2017(8):CD004064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub4

Ajani 2010.

Methods Multicentre RCT
2 arms
Quality score: A
Participants n = 1053
Median age: 59 years
ECOG 2‐3: 0%
Metastatic disease: 96%
Interventions S‐1+Cisplatin: S‐1 (50 mg/m2) in two daily doses d1‐21orally + cisplatin (75 mg/m2) repeated at d 28
versus
FU+Cisplatin: fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2/24 hrs as 120‐hour infusion) + cisplatin (100 mg/m2), repeated at d 28
Cisplatin was discontinued after 6 cycles; provision to continue S‐1 or FU until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicities
Outcomes Overall survival
Progression‐free survival
Time to treatment failure
Tumour response
Toxicity
Notes Second‐line therapy in 31.4% of patients, most frequently with fluoropyrimidine
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated dynamic randomisation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Centralised randomisation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 efficacy Low risk Full analysis set of all treated patients (98.8% in S‐1+cisplatin arm and 94.6% in FU+cisplatin arm)
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 safety Low risk Full analysis set of all treated patients
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk PEP: OS
SEP: ORR, PFS, TTF, safety
Other bias Low risk None
Blinded review of CT/MRI‐scans? Low risk Radiographic evidence of response to treatment was also independently reviewed. An independent data monitoring committee oversaw the safety and efficacy data along with other aspects of the conduct of the study.