Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 29;2017(8):CD004064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub4

GITSG 1988.

Methods Multicentre RCT
 3 arms
 Quality score: D
Participants n = 249
 Median age: 61
 ECOG 2‐3: 34%
Interventions FAP: 5‐FU 300 mg/m² d 1,8,15,22; adriamycin 30 mg/m² d 1; cisplatin 100 mg/m² d 1, repeated at d 29
 versus
 FAT: 5‐FU 300 mg/m² d1‐5; adriamycin 30 mg/m² d 1; triazinate 250 mg/m² d 22‐24, repeated at d 36
 versus
 FAMe: 5‐FU 325 mg/m² d1‐5, adriamycin 40 mg/m² d 1, Semustine 110 mg/m² p.os d 1, repeated at d 71
Outcomes Median survival
 Response rates
 Toxicity not classified according to WHO or NCI
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 efficacy Unclear risk Not clear how many screened for eligibility and excluded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 safety Unclear risk Not clear how many screened for eligibility and excluded
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Toxicity not classified according to WHO or NCI
Other bias Unclear risk N/A
Blinded review of CT/MRI‐scans? Unclear risk Not stated