Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 29;2017(8):CD004064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub4

Kikuchi 1990.

Methods Multicentre RCT
 2 arms
 Quality score: B
Participants n = 77
 Metastatic disease: 46%
 ECOG 2‐3: 88%
Interventions FA: 5‐FU 270 to 300 mg/m² CI d 1‐ 5; adriamycin 25 mg/m² d 5, repeated at d 22
 versus
 FAP: 5‐FU 270 to 300 mg/m² CI d 1‐ 5; adriamycin 25 mg/m² d 5; cisplatin 70 mg/m² d 1, repeated at d 22
Outcomes Median survival
 Response rates
Notes Translated from Japanese
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sequential opaque envelopes
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 efficacy Low risk All evaluable pts analysed
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 safety Low risk All evaluable pts analysed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Report includes all expected outcomes
Other bias Unclear risk N/A
Blinded review of CT/MRI‐scans? High risk Evaluated during group meetings