Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 29;2017(8):CD004064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub4

Kim 2001.

Methods Single‐centre RCT
 2 arms
 Quality score: B
Participants n = 121
 Metastatic disease: 90%
 ECOG 2‐3: 12%
Interventions FP: 5‐FU 1000 mg/m² over 6 hours d 1‐5; cisplatin 60 mg/m² d 1, repeated at d 29 versus
 ECF: epirubicine 50 mg/m² d 1; cisplatin 60 mg/m² d 1, 5‐FU: 1000 mg/m² d 1‐5, repeated at d 29
Outcomes Median survival
 1‐ and 2‐year survival rates
 Response rates
 Toxicity
Notes Study currently published as abstract only. Final results were provided by the first author.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Abstract / supplement only
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Abstract / supplement only
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 efficacy Unclear risk Abstract / supplement only
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 safety Unclear risk Abstract / supplement only
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Report includes all expected outcomes
Other bias Unclear risk Abstract / supplement only
Blinded review of CT/MRI‐scans? High risk Per first author